Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

'The Studio' creator refused Tim Cook a cameo

Tim Cook launched Apple TV+ in 2019 and still can't get an acting role in its shows -- image credit: Apple

Last updated

He does those Apple keynotes, he starred in a "Severance" promo, and oh, yeah, he controls Apple TV+. But none of that was enough for Seth Rogen, who reportedly turned down Apple when they wanted Tim Cook to get a cameo on "The Studio."

It's unlikely that Cook filmed an audition tape for "The Studio," but then you never know because it's also been reported that Apple doesn't interfere with productions on Apple TV+. AppleInsider contacts in television say that last is true, unless your show is in trouble, in which case Apple is all over you.

"The Studio" is not in trouble. Already commissioned for a second run, Seth Rogen's comedy drama about Hollywood is a critical hit, and attracting buzz around Apple TV+.

Most recently, that attention has been on how "The Studio" got Ted Sarandos, head of Netflix, to be the latest of the show's huge number of cameos. These cameos can be so crucial to the show's Hollywood satire that according to Deadline, creator Seth Rogen says he once scrapped an entire episode when he couldn't get who he needed.

He hasn't said who he'd wanted for that cameo, but since the episode was dropped, clearly Tim Cook wasn't waiting in the wings all season. Instead, it's now been revealed that Cook was put forward for this latest role, the one taken by Netflix's head.

While the news has only broken now that the Netflix cameo has aired, Business Insider magazine says that Cook was proposed — and immediately rejected — early on in the process.

"They asked if we could use Tim Cook instead, and we said no," Seth Rogen revealed to the publication during the red-carpet premiere for "The Studio" at the SXSW Film & TV Festival in March 2025.

That would be the same festival at which Apple's Eddy Cue and producer Ben Stiller enthused about how Apple never interferes with its shows.

Tim Cook in Apple's Mother Nature sketch Tim Cook has also had a go at comedy in Apple's Mother Nature sketch

It's not as if the cameo appearance is long — it's 65 seconds — but nonetheless Sarandos has been praised for just agreeing to do it. He plays himself, revealing that actors always thank him in their awards acceptances because he writes that into their contract.

If that's not self-deprecating enough, he adds: "I mean, otherwise, why in the world would they possibly thank us? We're bean counters. They're artists."

Maybe Tim Cook could've pulled off that kind of dig at studio bosses — he's done comedy before — but Sarandos's character also has to swear repeatedly. If Tim Cook isn't in fact a constantly polite individual, he's worked hard to appear so and this would've been a jolt.

It would've been an excellent jolt, certainly. If Cook had said this dialogue in this way, he would be being applauded for his ability to mock himself. He's certainly been willing to play up aspects of his keynotes, as with Apple's "Mission: Impossible" skit about his slide clicker.

Smiling person with glasses, wearing a dark shirt, looking at a large, glowing screen in a dimly lit environment. Tim Cook retrieves his slide clicker in Apple's "Mission: Impossible" skit — image source: Apple

But the reason he was turned down was probably not to do with his acting ability, or anything remotely against an Apple TV+ show being meta about Apple TV+. Instead, it was because Netflix is so much bigger in film and television than Apple that Ted Sarandos is that much bigger a player.

So instead of kudos to Tim Cook for a cameo, kudos to Apple for not interfering the show. Mind you, more kudos for Sarandos for mocking himself in a rival streamer's hit show.

Still, it's not the first time Cook has failed to get a starring role as himself. Back in 2018, Hank Azaria — best known for "The Simpsons," and "Mad About You" — won the role of Tim Cook in "Super Pumped," a drama series on Showtime that you've never heard of.

He shouldn't feel left out, though, since that same series cast Rob Morrow as Eddy Cue.

7 Comments

AppleZulu 9 Years · 2411 comments

The perfectly meta cameo in The Studio for Tim Cook has already come and gone. I even looked for it, because it would've been a chef's kiss in an already brilliant episode.

***spoiler alert***

The Oner is only the second episode. Seth Rogan is the Studio boss, excitedly going to the set where a movie's final scene being filmed. The conceit of the episode is that the director is filming the scene as a "oner," an extended scene shot with a single camera, with no cuts or edits. Raising the stakes even more, the scene is being filmed in the "golden hour" right before sunset, so there is only time to try to shoot the scene maybe twice before the sun goes down and the lighting is gone.

Rogan's studio head just loves movies and wants to see this being done, but it's common knowledge that a studio boss on set only complicates things and puts everyone on edge, especially when they start interfering by offering "notes" to the creatives. The director and performers will tell the boss he's welcome (especially if they think they can get perks or more money out of him), but they really, really don't want him there. Of course, Rogan's character immediately starts interfering and messing everything up. 

The brilliance of this episode is that it is itself filmed as a oner at sunset, and with only a single take possible, because the final scene has to land just after sunset as the streetlights are coming on. So the episode is already meta, in that the filming of the episode had to go perfectly in a single take, even as everything goes wrong in the plot of the story.

So the perfect Tim Cook cameo would have had him somewhere in the background of this episode, giving notes to an actor or member of the crew. It's not necessary to an already brilliant episode, but it would have been perfection.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
inkling 19 Years · 779 comments

If cameos were good enough for Alfred Hitchcock from 1927 on, I don't know why they wouldn't be OK for Tim Cook. I've heard that for Hitchcock they became such a big deal with fans that to keep them from spoiling their watching, he placed them near the start.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YbaOkiMiRQ

0 Likes · 3 Dislikes
mikethemartian 19 Years · 1627 comments

inkling said:

If cameos were good enough for Alfred Hitchcock from 1927 on, I don't know why they wouldn't be OK for Tim Cook. I've heard that for Hitchcock they became such a big deal with fans that to keep them from spoiling their watching, he placed them near the start.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YbaOkiMiRQ

You’re really comparing Tim Cook to Alfred Hitchcock?

1 Like · 1 Dislike
9secondkox2 9 Years · 3411 comments

Idk. If apple was giving this show life, it would have been more respectful to use cook in the “good guy who knows better” role instead of a competitor. So now, Cook is indirectly included on the other side of that. Not so cool. 

While I commend Apple for not interfering with a show creators wishes, it’s probably only bevause  tje creator is an established name and not an indie or lesser known. Apple has Ben know to turn a deaf ear to the peasants” but turn the whole apple Mach in on a dime for Taylor swift for example. 

This one just shows who won the power play over a tv show. Tom Hank’s once complained bitterly about how controlling apple was over a movie he starred in. But it seems apple doesn’t want to lose shows or talent and has decided to loosen its grip. That’s a good thing. 

However, I also am a firm believer that people are people and though Rogan got the greenlight for season 2, it’s only bevause the show is a hit. If it was just ok or mildly successful, hee get told to take a hike. And he may run into issues with other projects that aren’t obvious winners. 

You do have to wonder why Netflix instead of apple. Hopefully he shares some of his reasoning behind that. 

AppleZulu 9 Years · 2411 comments

Idk. If apple was giving this show life, it would have been more respectful to use cook in the “good guy who knows better” role instead of a competitor. So now, Cook is indirectly included on the other side of that. Not so cool. 
While I commend Apple for not interfering with a show creators wishes, it’s probably only bevause  tje creator is an established name and not an indie or lesser known. Apple has Ben know to turn a deaf ear to the peasants” but turn the whole apple Mach in on a dime for Taylor swift for example. 

This one just shows who won the power play over a tv show. Tom Hank’s once complained bitterly about how controlling apple was over a movie he starred in. But it seems apple doesn’t want to lose shows or talent and has decided to loosen its grip. That’s a good thing. 

However, I also am a firm believer that people are people and though Rogan got the greenlight for season 2, it’s only bevause the show is a hit. If it was just ok or mildly successful, hee get told to take a hike. And he may run into issues with other projects that aren’t obvious winners. 

You do have to wonder why Netflix instead of apple. Hopefully he shares some of his reasoning behind that. 

Don't read so much into it. The whole point of the episode is the anonymity of Hollywood studio presidents when it comes to credit for the films they make. Rogan's character just wants his mother to see him be thanked by the star of one of his movies at the Golden Globes. People know who Tim Cook is and what he does. I've never heard of the Netflix guy before this, and neither have you. I still wouldn't recognize him if he showed up on my porch with his daughter selling Girl Scout cookies. That's why he was the better choice to do a cameo as a studio boss telling Rogan's character to put it in his stars' contracts to thank him at awards shows and then get over himself and accept his anonymity. Everybody knows who Tim Cook is, so he's not the guy to be making that point.

0 Likes · 1 Dislike

OSZAR »